Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose Of Battle "IS" To Destroy Marriage - Revisit

How often have we heard from the Liberal and Secular world, "Don't be silly!  How can Same-Sex Marriage and the LGBTQ+ movement hurt you and your family?  Why don't you just mind your own business and let others love whoever they want?"

Is there truth in that statement/question?  Or is it just a sheet of Liberal Fog they are using to hide their real intention - the normalization and acceptance of any and all aberrant lifestyles?  For many years I have most certainly been witnessing a heavy fog of Liberalism rolling in across America.

Below is a blog I first posted in 2013.  And we have to admit that what was brought to light in that blog five years ago - is becoming reality today across America.  I think it is time the fog is blown away and the true intent of the Liberal Left Movement is shown in all its true anti-God, anti-American, anti-Family glory. 

That said, let me offer this Fog Warning blog for your consideration:

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose Of Battle "IS" To Destroy Marriage
April 16, 2013 at 3:25pm

This morning, when I saw the article "Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage" on Facebook - I was not going to share it on the TimesDaily Religion Forum. 

But since an atheist Forum Friend felt a need to share the article "Judge Rules In Favor Of Women Denied Room At Hawaii Bed And Breakfast Because They're Gay"  (http://news.yahoo.com/judge-rules-favor-lesbians-suing-130056847.html) - I felt that, in support of fair play, I should also present this Gay Activist's view of Same-Sex Marriage and the homosexual lifestyle.

Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose Of Battle Is To Destroy Marriage
http://illinoisfamily.org/homosexuality/homosexual-activist-admits-true-purpose-of-battle-is-to-destroy-marriage/
Written By Micah Clark   |   April 6, 2013

"In 1989 Micah Clark graduated from Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, Missouri with a bachelor’s degree in Political Science.  Micah then served as a legislative assistant for Citizens Concerned for the Constitution. He served as the Indiana Family Institute’s Director of Public Policy, and later as its Executive Director, throughout the 1990’s. In November 2001, Micah became the Executive Director of the American Family Association of Indiana."

Even knowing that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen.  On a radio show she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda.  She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage - they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it.

Here is what she recently said on a radio interview:

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. .  .  .  (F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.

The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change.  And again, I don’t think it should exist.  And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life.  That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.

I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally.  .  .  I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. 

So the five parents break down into two groups of three.  .  .  And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

(Source: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lifematters/why-get-married/4058506)

For quite some time, the defenders of natural marriage have attempted to point out that the true agenda behind the homosexual demands organizations is not marriage equality - it is the total unraveling of marriage and uprooting traditional values from society.  This will ultimately include efforts to silence and punish some churches that openly adhere to their religious teachings about marriage and sexual morality.

While few have been as vocal as this lesbian activist was in this interview, we do have numerical examples proving her point.  When given the opportunity to marry, after laws have been struck down relatively small percentages of homosexuals actually bother to marry compared to their heterosexual counterparts.

This raises question about the true need to unravel marriage for the “fair” extension (of) its benefits.  Only 12 percent of homosexuals in the Netherlands marry compared to 86 percent of their heterosexual peers.  Less than 20 percent of same-sex couples already living together in California married when given the chance in 2008.  In contrast, 91 percent of heterosexual couples in California who are living together are married.

Clearly this is about cultural change and tearing down the traditional family ethic, since it seems that most homosexuals living together neither need nor desire to marry, though they do desire to radically change marriage.

Gays and lesbians are free to live as they choose, and we live in a society which roundly applauds them doing so like never before in our history.  But they do not have the right to rewrite marriage for all of society.

As a Christian, I believe that Traditional Marriage (one man, one woman) was instituted in Genesis, the first book of the Bible.  And, once again for the record, I do not hate homosexuals and lesbians, nor does God.  I do not feel that we should relegate them to subnormal status in our society. 

BUT, I do not believe we should allow them to destroy Traditional Marriage, which has been the way of life in America for almost 400 years (from the Mayflower Compact in 1620 to today).

Homosexuality is not a Civil Right!  It is a societal desire and way of life.  Everyone in America has the same right - to marry any other willing person they desire - of the opposite sexual gender.  No, they cannot marry children.  No, they cannot marry their pet dog or sheep.  No, they cannot have multiple spouses at the same time.   That is not what was meant in these words below when, in 1620, the Mayflower Compact was written:

In the name of God, Amen.  We, whose names are underwritten, . . .  Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and advancements of the Christian faith, and the honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northern parts of Virginia; do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one another; covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.

Those early settlers of America knew that man, left to his own desires, would corrupt our mutual society.  So, being forced by bad weather to land in Massachusetts rather than their initial destination of Virginia - the first thing they did before establishing their homes at what became Plymouth Rock, Massachusetts - was to set down a body of civic law to govern ALL people equally - not giving special privileges to a few who want to be different.

I believe that is a good rule of thumb for America today.  That we ALL live by and under the same laws and rules.  And, one of those is Traditional Marriage, the cornerstone of our American nation and society.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill